|
June 20, 2005 |
Washington, D.C. Courtesy NASA Cassini photograph #9, which may be of Saturn, Bigfoot, or a Tom Jones concert, among other possibilities fter years of fiscal excess in the 1980’s, when the organization famously spent millions of dollars on magic space beans, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s legendary cost-cutting backfired this week when NASA head Dean Michaels admitted that he personally regrets equipping the Cassini-Huygens spacecraft, currently orbiting Saturn, with a 27-shot disposable camera.
“Though the decision seemed a wise one at first,” apologized Michaels before we cut him off to identify the speaker, “due to the camera’s low cost and ease of processing at over 10,000 Photomats and convenience stores across the country, we are finally now coming to understand why no one has ever used one of these things for deep-space photography before: They suck big-time.”
...
fter years of fiscal excess in the 1980’s, when the organization famously spent millions of dollars on magic space beans, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s legendary cost-cutting backfired this week when NASA head Dean Michaels admitted that he personally regrets equipping the Cassini-Huygens spacecraft, currently orbiting Saturn, with a 27-shot disposable camera.
“Though the decision seemed a wise one at first,” apologized Michaels before we cut him off to identify the speaker, “due to the camera’s low cost and ease of processing at over 10,000 Photomats and convenience stores across the country, we are finally now coming to understand why no one has ever used one of these things for deep-space photography before: They suck big-time.”
Providing an array of blurry, blown-up photographs to illustrate his point, Michaels offered a shot-by-shot analysis of the confusing images from Cassini’s Fuji QuickSnap Outdoor.
“Jesus, that’s not even what we were aiming at!” Michaels yelled while examining the first photograph. “That’s the Alpha Centauri! Fucking Fujifilm.”
“This one, I have no idea what this is,” Michaels admitted, gesturing to a blurry gray photograph featuring a vaguely floral print. “Can anybody see anything in this? I’m not even sure if we’ve got it right-side up.”
Most intriguing of all the shots, however, was #17, which seemed to provide bizarrely compelling evidence that Cassini had somehow managed to snap a picture of a NASA technician’s thumb from deep space.
“This one’s a miracle of bad photography,” explained Michaels. “People should be praying to this thing instead of some batshit on an underpass somewhere,” Michaels added, referring to the Mother Mary apparition discovered earlier this year under a bridge in Illinois.
Beyond the photo quality issue, NASA also ran into problems with the camera’s 27-exposure capacity, which is fine for most weddings or a day at the beach, but somewhat restrictive when trying to capture the vast wonder of the solar system.
“Yeah, that was a boner,” admitted Michaels. “We’ve only got three shots left and four more planets to go, so it’s going to be tough. We’re going to have to line them up for a panoramic shot or something, hopefully without the sun in the background since that always makes everything look all dark and washed-out. What can I say? We were in the checkout lane and it seemed like a good idea. It has definitely served us better than the Bic lighter and CrystalBurst gum that Stevens wanted to get for the same money.”
Critics are citing the Cassini debacle as the organization’s biggest embarrassment since the 1990 launching of the super-powerful Hubble telescope, which has mostly been used by technicians to take scarily detailed bird’s-eye view photos of their homes from outer space, after expensive repairs were made to fix the out-of-focus lenses NASA ended up with when a sponsorship deal and partnership with mall-based eyewear provider LensCrafters backfired.
But NASA supporters call such claims ludicrous, since they totally disregard all the malfunctioning toy trucks the large contingent of RC-car enthusiasts at NASA have landed on foreign planets between those two events.
“We went to the fucking moon, people,” Michaels snapped after this reporter asked if they might have been better off trading up to a disposable camera model with a built-in flash, considering the darkness of space. Michaels defaulted to a common NASA dodge that comes up whenever critics point out the organization’s frequent misadventures. “Think about that for a second. The moon. What have you done?” the commune news would like to take this opportunity to honor the first woman in space, Ralph Kramden’s wife Alice. Or was it that chick who blew up? No, that’s just mean. And in our book, it hardly counts as space if you don’t at least get out of sight of the people on the ground first. So forget that. Boner Cunningham is the commune’s teeniest reporter, but we’re careful to clarify that by that we mean “most like a teen-ager,” since fellow reporter Ted Ted takes great, violent pride in his status as our smallest.
| June 20, 2005 |
Shown in this sketch from the cover of their planned debut album Meet the Jurors, the jury in the Michael Jackson trial could not find specific evidence of sexual contact with this particular alleged victim, leading to the pop star’s release… from jail. he 12 jurors in the Michael Jackson trial surprised some hopeless optimists last week when they returned a verdict of “not guilty” on all 10 counts, allowing the King of Pop his legal freedom and probably inspiring some questionable lyrics from a future album. Among the reasons given by the jury for their decision, more than one, two in fact, said they believed Jackson probably did molest virtually every child who came into his mansion—but not this kid, according to the evidence.
Legal analysts, and by that we mean lawyers without jobs, have pointed to startling revelations during testimony of witnesses to explain the “not guilty” verdict in the Jackson case. Among the more surprising disclosures was that the accused, long thought to be a 13-year-old boy, was in fa...
he 12 jurors in the Michael Jackson trial surprised some hopeless optimists last week when they returned a verdict of “not guilty” on all 10 counts, allowing the King of Pop his legal freedom and probably inspiring some questionable lyrics from a future album. Among the reasons given by the jury for their decision, more than one, two in fact, said they believed Jackson probably did molest virtually every child who came into his mansion—but not this kid, according to the evidence.
Legal analysts, and by that we mean lawyers without jobs, have pointed to startling revelations during testimony of witnesses to explain the “not guilty” verdict in the Jackson case. Among the more surprising disclosures was that the accused, long thought to be a 13-year-old boy, was in fact a diminutive man with a long police record, known in street parlance as Philadelphia Freddy.
“And I would have gotten away with it, too, if it weren’t for this money-driven legal system!” screeched the gravel-voiced midget, shortly after the announcement of the verdict.
The defense painted a strong picture of a short, unruly child/crime boss and his money-grubbing mother, who parlayed a brush with cancer into a molestation gold mine and tried to catch Michael Jackson in a kid-touching trap, to no avail. Jackson, who had previously settled out-of-court molestation cases on at least two previous occasions, could not be fingered, pardon the expression, in this particular molesting accusation. Jurors claim that although they really wanted to hang Jackson out to dry for all the other occasions of molestation he’s been guilty of, in this special and rare instance, he wasn’t guilty of that specific crime.
“It’s obvious Michael Jackson is a sick, sick man-child,” said a juror, who asked not to be identified, but looked like a “George” to us. “But in this particular case, as brought by Jackson-hounding D.A. Tom Sneddon, there wasn’t enough evidence to nail his peculiarly shaded ass. It’s too bad, because I think he molested three or four kids of some of the jurors, but we weren’t actually trying those cases, and had to go by what the judge instructed us.”
Some critics of the case have not only charged Sneddon with fumbling an easily unfumbleable ball, but have alleged the way the case was framed by the judge made it hard for a jury to convict Jackson of the crime. Among the strange instructions, Judge Rodney Melville warned jurors could not consider previous allegations of sexual abuse made against Jackson, and Jackson’s celebrity status had to be ignored.
“I ask you again,” said Judge Melville, “to think of Michael Jackson as any ordinary man who can afford the world’s most powerful attorneys at his beck and call. If you like, you may also think of Jackson’s heartfelt song, ‘Man in the Mirror,’ and how it made all of us think of how any one of us has the power to change the world. Me, I personally love to think of his small but pivotal solo in the ‘We Are the World’ song.”
Santa Barbara District Attorney Tom Sneddon, described by some as a bloated law enforcement official out to bring down the King of Pop, no matter the humiliation done to him and his office, said he regretted the jury’s finding, but had no complaints against the case his office had built, the jury itself, the judge’s role in the case, or the case of the defense. He only wished they had been able to call as a witness one of the other “possible million” boys Jackson had likely molested.
At the same time, a nationwide poll performed by people with lots of time on their hands, found that up to 49% of respondents thought the jury had made the wrong decision, and that Jackson was guilty of molesting boys. Though the exact same percentage also hoped similar charges would be brought against Huey Lewis and the News, anything to make sure they didn’t show up on some future VH-1 ‘80s nostalgia special. the commune news congratulates Michael Jackson on getting off, and we’ll just stop that joke in progress while some modicum of good taste may be preserved. Ramrod Hurley is a top-notch office manager here at the commune, and this verdict certainly jeopardizes his own Michael Jackson civil suit he’s been cooking up.
| $6 billion contract bounces away from Boeing Brad Pitt, Angelina Jolie: People love stars who fuck WWF takes hard stance against whaling, foreign objects in ring Discriminating junkies buy cheaper heroin, crack-cocaine in Canada |
|
|
|
June 20, 2005 Don't Be Absurd My Dear, That's Obviously Not My ShitPlease.
Deidrebane, my dear, I tire of your ceaseless accusations. I swear this is all I've heard about all week since you found that softball-sized rock of crack cocaine in the sofa cushions. For the googleth time, darling, that's clearly not my shit. Do you see my initials monogrammed anywhere on the rock? My elegantly formal CC? Or even one of my famous "Hands Off!" post-it notes? I think not. So let's put this silly controversy to bed before I miss another moment of the Ultimate Fighting Challenge.
No, of course I don't know whose crack rock it might be. Did you ask the children? All of them? You really called Montpellier at reform school? I have to admit I'm impressed by your thoroughness, my dear. What did he have to say? Lonely? Wants to come home? Hit another ...
º Last Column: My Dear, Your New Children Have Become a Nuisance º more columns
Please. Deidrebane, my dear, I tire of your ceaseless accusations. I swear this is all I've heard about all week since you found that softball-sized rock of crack cocaine in the sofa cushions. For the googleth time, darling, that's clearly not my shit. Do you see my initials monogrammed anywhere on the rock? My elegantly formal CC? Or even one of my famous "Hands Off!" post-it notes? I think not. So let's put this silly controversy to bed before I miss another moment of the Ultimate Fighting Challenge. No, of course I don't know whose crack rock it might be. Did you ask the children? All of them? You really called Montpellier at reform school? I have to admit I'm impressed by your thoroughness, my dear. What did he have to say? Lonely? Wants to come home? Hit another student with a cue ball? Really? Now that's showing some initiative. I may have misjudged the lad. Was he playing pool or billiards? Snooker? Even better! Remind me to send him a snuff box for Father's Day. I know he's not a father, Deidrebane, but anyone can enjoy a fine mahogany snuff box. Don't be so closed-minded. Did I see the maid rifling through the couch like she'd just lost several thousands of dollars worth of illegal narcotics? My dear, name me a day when that hasn't happened! You know how Consequa is, with her rifling. That's why we chose her from among the finalists, don't you remember? Consequa was rifling like a pro long after the others had succumbed to fatigue and delirium. It's her calling card, like Carson with that golf stroke. You know, Rich Carson, when he had that stroke on the course? He milked that for years, dear, always japing like he'd burst a blood vessel in his brain whenever the moment called for levity. Whatever happened to him, anyway? Died of a stroke? Really? I bet it was hilarious. Yes, I suppose it could have been the butler's crack rock, now that you bring up the possibility. He's always creeping around in the shadows, answering the door at all hours of the night. Never trusted that behavior. What was his name again? Lee Butler? That's convenient. Can't believe I couldn't remember that name, how long have we had him? Is that in decades? My word. Remind me to send him a snuff box for Arbor Day. You know, dear, it could have very well been the dog's. We don't know where he goes at night. Why are you looking at me like that? I wouldn't even know where to find a five-pound rock of pure crack cocaine. Not at this hour, anyway. Let's get back to the dog thing. Have you noticed that guilty look on his face lately? And the other day he was obviously jonesing, twitching on the floor like an electrocuted sea bass. What? I don't believe for a second that all dogs do that while they're sleeping, where did you read that? Dog dreams? Have you been watching that Oprah program again? Sincerely, Deidrebane, sometimes I wonder about you. º Last Column: My Dear, Your New Children Have Become a Nuisanceº more columns |
|
| |
Quote of the Day“1.327493 is the loneliest number. Technically.”
-Inglebert Thomas, Professor of MathematicsFortune 500 CookieYou will quit smoking, but only in hospital nurseries. One step at a time, baby. You will finally lose that unwanted 50 pounds, thanks to a fortuitous kidnapping. The bank won't be your only withdrawal this week, drugnuts. You will believe everything you read.
Try again later.Top 2004 Blockbuster Busts1. | For the Love of Godzilla | 2. | Jaws 5: Jaws of Life | 3. | Romy & Michelle's Jai Alai Reunion | 4. | Gargamel: The Movie | 5. | Dude, Where's My Cartographer?: The Christopher Columbus Story | |
| Contractors Warn: Don't Send Kids to Camp FallujaBY orson welch 6/20/2005 No time for chit-chat. Hollywood has bombarded us with first-run DVD releases after months of drowning us in TV. So let's check out some of them.
Now on DVD:
Coach Carter A real novelty: Inner-city black and Hispanic kids who receive a lesson in heart and morality from a non-white character. Otherwise, it's another To Sir With Love (or Dangerous Minds, depending on your generation) where an optimistic, yet surprisingly cynical authority figure bucks the system to teach the kids not to buck the system. Good job. Oh, and there's some basketball here and there, I think. No face masks and they don't use their feet, so I guess it's basketball.
Hostage Here's a fresh twist: Bruce Willis rescues people held hostage. I...
No time for chit-chat. Hollywood has bombarded us with first-run DVD releases after months of drowning us in TV. So let's check out some of them. Now on DVD:Coach CarterA real novelty: Inner-city black and Hispanic kids who receive a lesson in heart and morality from a non-white character. Otherwise, it's another To Sir With Love (or Dangerous Minds, depending on your generation) where an optimistic, yet surprisingly cynical authority figure bucks the system to teach the kids not to buck the system. Good job. Oh, and there's some basketball here and there, I think. No face masks and they don't use their feet, so I guess it's basketball. HostageHere's a fresh twist: Bruce Willis rescues people held hostage. I think it might have originally been titled Die Hard: Die Already, but they decided they'd rather use one of the other Die Hard sequel scripts out there for that franchise. You see, in the Die Hard movies, Bruce Willis' hairline is receding; in Hostage, he's bald. And so is the plot. It's very violent, but not to the screenwriters, which is what you're really hoping for. It might be enjoyable, if you're able to surgically remove your brain, leave it at home, and just enjoy men being cruel to each other. At least most audiences managed to escape these hostage-takers. The PacifierWith this movie, on the other hand, there's no need to remove your brain, since it will probably forcibly eject itself from your skull two minutes into the film. And I use the word "film" in the loosest sense. The Hollywood hive mind deemed, "Let's make a film that makes Kindergarten Cop look like taut suspense." And that's the story of how this was shat out. It's for that microscopic percentage of people who actually wanted to see Vin Diesel in another movie, and that sub-microscopic subset that wanted to see his sensitive side in action. What makes it all the more comedic to me is "Vin Diesel" has always sounded like the name of a self-mocking character Schwarzenegger would play in a light-hearted comedy version of his own life story. But this movie is even too painful to enjoy ironically. I'm not sure any of the characters actually speak English, the other critics and I were screaming too loudly to make anything out. Diary of a Mad Black WomanIt's too bad this movie has become a source of division between white critics and black audiences, when it's obviously just bad. The saddest thing is the number of liberal critics who have been guilted into seeing the "positive points" in this movie. I believe in true equality, regardless of color, and this movie just insults audiences of every race, religion, and creed. You don't see me out there representing the foibles of white culture, defending Baywatch to those who don't understand what appeals to us. It's okay to like something that's clearly awful—or actually it's not, but let's suppose you're going to like it anyway. But don't make it some sort of grand cultural gap. Bad is bad, insulting is insulting. And this Mad Woman is just awful, black or not. If we've got this sorted out, I'd like to address this "Kings of Comedy" thing once and for all next time… And I didn't even bother with Miss Congeniality 2. And believe me, I could have. |