As allegations and evidence continue to mount that Iraqi prisoners were subject to abuse and humiliation in U.S. military custody, the administration promised a change would come to the way prisoners were held, and that every dollar at their disposal would be used to fix or hush up the problem.

“This is a disgrace to America and all it stands for,” said a current U.S. president, speaking on the condition of anonymity. “This is not the way we do things in this country—torturing prisoners, committing sexual acts with those in captivity, and getting caught in the act. It is against all we believe in. It makes a mockery of America and takes away our moral high ground. What’s worse, they took pictures of it, hard evidence. What are we teaching our soldiers today?”

The president assured the media money would be thrown at the problem until it went away or was solved, and that the budget would not rest until enough green stemmed the tide of outrage.

Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, under fire and pressured to resign in the wake of the scandal, laid out a more specific plan of monetary problem-solving.

“Here’s a fifty-dollar bill,” said Rumsfeld, holding the currency up for media scrutiny. “As reparations, the U.S. government plans to give each and every victim of prison abuse one of these. That’s a lot of money for an alleged terrorist or Baghdad bagman. It’s in dollars, too, not drachmas or anything. And if you can prove you were sodomized, actually sodomized, not pretend, we’ll make it a hundred.”

Rumsfeld also said monetary reparations would be made to any prisoners who didn’t survive incarceration, if their deaths could be proven with pictures. Another method of solving the problem proposed by Rumsfeld is increasing the number of military troops sent to Iraq—with more troops to supervise, it makes perfect sense less abuse would occur within the prisons. Some critics charge the U.S. is trying to buy its way out of a bad press situation, which is something the critics say is completely unlike the United States. Kim Meducci of the Washington, D.C.-area chapter of Amnesty International, called the offer of money an insult to human rights.

“This is the kind of thing other countries do to their prisoners, not America,” said Meducci. “Surely if a prisoner had ever been abused in the entire history of the United States we would have heard about it. It’s a shame a few bad apples, a few rogue Americans who snuck around abusing prisoners, got caught. Which is to say, shouldn’t have been doing such things in the first place. It’s clearly not the way a military force occupying a hostile country behaves. And the administration should be ashamed of itself, more so, for trying to buy its way out of a scandal.”

the commune only managed to end the quote by agreeing to take several pamphlets and provide a tax-deductible donation to the organization.

Some sources inside the Pentagon defended U.S. interrogation tactics, which critics have said created an atmosphere of secrecy and implied consent which tolerated and even encouraged the abuse documented in thousands of photos, video clips, and even some popular barracks songs. An anonymous Pentagon source, Col. Gerald Fetchen, spoke to the commune.

“American forces, especially the special ones, need a free hand to move as they want in protecting American concerns. If we start having to charge prisoners, to show evidence of terrorist involvement, if we have to start accounting for who we put behind bars and why they’re there, we’ll never get justice done.”