Difference between revisions of "Talk:Capper Crush"
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
--[[User:GersonK|GersonK]] 00:05, 13 May 2006 (UTC) | --[[User:GersonK|GersonK]] 00:05, 13 May 2006 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | I was going for an artsy fartsy collage-type thing with it. While the gallery or thumbnail features will definitely come into play somewhere on this Wiki mo9e than once, I didn't want to apply it here. Perhaps it's time I loaded up Photoshop or PaintShop Pro and stitch together mine own? Also, I like Glitter's idea of smaller pictures. Anyway . . . I thought it was a bit much. Thanks for the critiques, guys. I'll make something up in place of this. | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[User:ArchHallJr|Arch]] 03:08, 13 May 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 03:08, 13 May 2006
The pictures
Is this too much? I'm not really good at picture placement. I just threw these up to the wall to see if any of them stuck . . .
Arch 23:10, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
Well, I've always thought the whole capper crush thing was a bit much, but who am I to argue?
I would suggest that having some text before the images might help the flow of the page, especially for cappers who don't spend much time at glitter's or the e-groups and therefore have no idea why such an allegedly iconoclastic group would be doing all this celebrity worship.
Also, have you considered the gallery feature or the thumbnail feature?
--GersonK 00:05, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
I was going for an artsy fartsy collage-type thing with it. While the gallery or thumbnail features will definitely come into play somewhere on this Wiki mo9e than once, I didn't want to apply it here. Perhaps it's time I loaded up Photoshop or PaintShop Pro and stitch together mine own? Also, I like Glitter's idea of smaller pictures. Anyway . . . I thought it was a bit much. Thanks for the critiques, guys. I'll make something up in place of this.
Arch 03:08, 13 May 2006 (UTC)