In what most are calling an incredibly tight no-way race, as in “no way are any of these guys going to be president,” all Democratic candidates are finding themselves beaten in Iowa Democratic Caucus polls by a write-in vote for the candidate known as only “Not Bush.”

Though vagaries in the caucus system make polling unreliable, the most reliable polls show clearly the “Not Bush” candidate leading the way far ahead of the pack of current Democrats. Representatives of the Iowa caucus said they spent three days searching for the lead candidate before realizing it was not an actual person, merely a vote rejecting a supposed actual person.

Early poll results show the runner-up position still being a no-way battle between national frontrunner Howard Dean, Sen. Dick Gephardt, Sen. John Kerry, Sen. John Edwards, or possibly another person altogether. With all four candidates concentrating their attention on winning over undecided Iowa voters, Dean and Gephardt pulled their negative ads to focus on a more positive way to say the other candidates suck, while Kerry and Edwards both inched forward in the polls, oblivious to the fact there’s no way either would ever be elected president. Running behind those four Democrats were Gen. Wesley Clark, Sen. Joe Lieberman, Sen. Carol Mosley Braun (who pulled out of the race earlier in the week), Sen. Bob Graham (who pulled out of the race months ago), a candidate known as “Not Sharpton,” Al Gore (who isn’t even running), Al Sharpton, and finally, Dennis Kucinich.

Iowa caucus expert Henry “Iowa” Jones felt the numbers would be representative of Iowa’s opinion of the Democratic candidates, and expressed a national dissatisfaction with its political choices.

“The American people have fervently and decidedly said they do not want George Bush for their president, if these polls are any indication,” said Jones. “However, we rolled out candidates that we here in Iowa would call, ‘real dillies.’ You can sort of see the American people collectively wincing and asking, ‘Okay. Are these my only choices?’”

Jones further elaborated, when asked to fill column space. “It’s quite a simple quandary. In layman’s terms, the American people are hungry, but nothing we’ve suggested sounds good. They’re not quite sure what they exactly want, but it’s very likely not anything we’ve offered. Like saying, ‘Seafood? Italian? Mexican?’ And the American people are starting to think they’d rather just stay in and crack open a bag of chips, politically speaking.”

However, though the news is good for no one, it’s not bad for everyone. In particular, little-known independent presidential candidate Lyle Woodman stands to benefit greatly if the polls truly show how people will cast their votes in the national elections. At least, Woodman will benefit once he finishes the legal process of changing his name to “Not Bush” in October, 2004.

“I had a feeling ‘Not Bush’ would be a name with a lot of political weight back when I was watching the 2000 presidential election,” said Woodman, tentatively referring to himself as Not. “In fact, if I remember correctly, Not Bush won in a very, very close race against the Republican candidate, Not Gore.”